> > It might be time to revist some of these tools for interactive > > > > collaboration. Smart is a Canadian company; maybe we should > > get them as a sponosor for IETF 64. > > > Now _that_ would be way cool.
maybe. however, rather than our starting with an interesting in some set of tools that fall into an interesting, albeit large and vague -- area, perhaps we should figure out what we need to do that we can't reasonably do now. tools have their own expense, and we already have quite a few. adding useful ones would be... useful. adding ones that are not highly useful would be more hassle that they are worth. given email, jabber and multi-casting voice/video, what additional collaborative processes might be helpful for getting IETF face-to-face meetings more productive? i believe this sub-thread was triggered by an interest in something like a real whiteboard that could be digitally captured and shared. Is that the function we need a tool for? are there others? d/ --- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
