Ah, but the candidates know who they are, and can arrange their own positive input.
If the list were open, might the nomcom receive more and better balanced input? - Ralph On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 13:49 -0400, Melinda Shore wrote: > On May 9, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Scott W Brim wrote: > > I don't understand why making names public would increase > > electioneering over what we already have. > > "Electioneering" is perhaps the wrong word, since it implies > behavior on the part of the candidates. What I'm thinking about > is pressure from interested parties. Right now, for example, the > process does a pretty good job of protecting itself from situations > in which a company decides that it really needs to have someone on > the IESG, or ones in which a bunch of people want to push a > particular technology through and need to get IESG support. > > Melinda > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
