On Friday, June 10, 2005 04:25:58 PM -0400 Keith Moore <[email protected]>
wrote:
> at the very least it illustrates that using vague terms in a technical
> specification without defining those terms can lead to
> misunderstanding.
Keith, the problem with pushing so hard to win a point, without actually
reading things carefully, is that the material often does not
substantiate the point.
What you are so winningly touting was not, as you indicate, a problem
with the text, but a problem with my use of a different term in this
thread.
Dave,
I disagree. I think this illustrates that you don't have a clear handle
on what you are talking about.
rather than try so hard to deny that the text is ambiguous, why not just
fix the text?
FWIW, I found the actual text perfectly clear; it was indeed the discussion
that was confusing. I wouldn't object to further clarification, but I
don't have text to propose, either. Do you?
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
