On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0200, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
> The list of "satisfied" is of ne real interest. The list of "disatistied"
> seem important enough to say there is no consensus.
No IETF consensus is required to accept or deny a registration for the
registry in question under the current rules; instead IESG approval is
required instead.
And if there is no consensus, then there is also no consensus to
change RFC 2780, under which auspices the IESG acted....
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
