-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Keith Moore wrote: >>External reviews are what I'm favoring - external, independent reviews. > > so when IESG provides the external review, that's bad, but when someone > else does external review, that's good? Yup. When judges decide cases, that's bad. When juries do, that's good. > I disagree. part of IESG's purpose > is to do review from a broad perspective. On that we agree to disagree; I see no such charter implied or expressed in 2026 - and the fact that it notes the need for _independent_ technical review is, well, notable. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCzB3XE5f5cImnZrsRAqW2AJ9oPRu7ViJDiPrE8DpnW14OtlM1bQCfcHha qQ/HwRBAkw63JvoFw9QdM30= =mcyA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
