> Date: 2005-07-06 16:16 > From: Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ned Freed wrote: > > This is exactly what I predicted would happen - the IANA considerations > > section > > has now become part of the boilerplate in at least one I-D template. > > (Actually > > make that two - I put in in my own equivalent template some time back.) You can make it three: mine says: This memo adds no new IANA considerations. The presence of this template text indicates that the author/editor has not actually reviewed IANA considerations. and there's similar text for internationalization and security. > The goal of putting it in the template is to encourage it be addressed, > rather than forgotten altogether. > > However, I'm not at all in favor of requirements to IDs that are added > ad-hoc; until this actually makes it into an RFC as a formal > requirement, it won't be in the word template I manage. I wouldn't call it ad-hoc; it's part of an IESG-generated document on the official IETF web site, and it also has been documented for quite some time in the draft successor to RFC 2223 also known as instructions2authors. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
