works for me (assuming that you include non-IETF documents when you say "IETF review documents")
Scott ---- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 18:12:46 2005 X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Bradner) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-02.txt References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:12:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Scott Bradner's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:52:38 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii would it be reasonable to just say that we are going to always last call IETF review documents? Personally I'd approve of this option unless people think it is too restrictive. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
