On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Kevin Loch wrote: a simple dual stack router upstream or hrizontally placed from the host in question solves the problem. let me know if my assistence is necessary. i will build one remotely if necessary.
Scott > Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > The problem here seems to be more the fact that, in the US, getting IPv6 > > connectivity can be quite tiresome. Cogent, the current IPv4 upstream, > > doesn't do IPv6 (they have 2001:500:2::/48) for instance. UUnet could > > maybe do IPv6. Maybe the secretariat would wants to try out some tunnels? > > If connectivity means a colocated server with IPv4 and IPv6 service, > that can easially be found in the US. Finding an IPv6 ISP POP in > an arbitrary local town is quite a bit more difficult. > > If these are just dedicated/colocated servers and IPv6 is a requirement, > move them to a hosting company that supports IPv6. If you are not > willing to take your business elsewhere then why should your current > hosts offer it? > > - Kevin > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > sleekfreak pirate broadcast http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
