On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 19:14, John C Klensin wrote:
> Even if one believes that it is desirable, 3967 already weakens
> traditional norms for documents on the IETF standards track. A
> suggestion that further weakening is needed definitely calls for
> some discussion, at least IMO.
There is considerable historic variation between areas on this supposed
"norm"; I don't think it's appropriate to characterize 3967 as uniformly
"weakening" (or "strengthening") any norms.
In particular, there is a long-established tradition of specifying
cryptographic algorithms as "Informational" documents, and referring to
them from standards-track documents.
- Bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
