> -----Original Message----- > From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 11:29 PM > To: Scott Hollenbeck; [email protected] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP
[snip] > 3. one of these difficulties is that such an Internet core issue to > the Multilingual Internet is addressed by a closed BCP instead of an > open Standard. Let make the successor document a Standard Track > document replacing a centralised control by a distributed solution. Jefsey, You seem to be misunderstanding the distinction between BCPs and standards track documents. There's nothing "closed" about BCPs. They are subject to the exact same community review, approval, and appeal processes that are used for standards track documents. If I've misunderstood what you mean by "closed", please feel free to clarify so that I and others can better understand your comment. -Scott- _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
