[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LLMNR has waded through the lengthy IETF standardization
process to get to where it is. That Microsoft has been patient and
spent
the money needed to keep people on this task long enough to get it here
should be rewarded with the IETF imprinture. Of course even Microsoft
has
hedged its bets (even they are aware of the need to ship products) wrt
LLMNR. But that is no reason for the IETF to not sanction this work.
--bill
How about a protocol to remotely control the explosion of bombs. It could
even be built on top of LLMNR. It is not necessaryly more harmful than
LLMNR. Nobody intends to build bombs anyhow not to mention remotely explode
them. So would you consider publishing this protocol harmful?
Terrorists - I am sorry, weapons researches have spent a lot ...
We should really reward them by publishing this parodicol :)
Is that what you meant?
Regards
Peter
--
Peter and Karin Dambier
Public-Root
Graeffstrasse 14
D-64646 Heppenheim
+49-6252-671788 (Telekom)
+49-179-108-3978 (O2 Genion)
+49-6252-750308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
+1-360-448-1275 (VoIP: freeworldialup.com)
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://iason.site.voila.fr
http://www.kokoom.com/iason
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
