In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc Manthey writes:
>
>>
>> i'm going to have to raise the point that Peters "root-server"
>> system
>> is his private "walled-garden" and not representative of the
>> Internet's
>> authoritative root servers. Just for clarification.
>>
>> --bill
>
>
>i want to correct bills concern that , " peters public root server
>system" is
>an alternative for the existing ones and there are several others .
>
>
At the risk of starting down a tangent, the IETF does not, as a
technical matter, accept the validity of so-called alternate roots.
See RFC 2826.
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
