On 9/19/05 4:23 PM, "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think all areas in the IETF are more-or-less defined as "core of the > area" + "what is closely linked to the core" + "what fits less badly there > than elsewhere" - ECRIT would come under "closely linked", since its > subject area is use of the SIP-type services; GEOPRIV might be more > characteristic of "fits less badly here than elsewhere" - it is used by > many of the services like ECRIT, but is also used (or should be) by WGs in > other areas.
I think there may be a problem here in that "real time" may suggest to a number of people a level of rigor in timing that's really not applicable to much of the work the new area is intended to cover. I'm enthusiastic about the area; not so crazy about its name. Melinda _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
