Harald,
The trouble is - know it or not - this "language choice"
is the result of a lot of wrangling. Your comment is a late
comer to the "party" as we have been round and round on this
as well as other issues relating to this document. What you
see now is the current negotiated position, and it would be
very nice if we did not have yet another round of negotiations
because someone else is not exactly happy with what we have...
--
Eric
--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
--> Harald Tveit Alvestrand
--> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:23 PM
--> To: Stewart Bryant; [email protected]
--> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
--> Subject: Re: [PWE3] Last Call: 'IANA Allocations for pseudo
--> Wire Edge to
--> Edge Emulation (PWE3)' to BCP
-->
-->
-->
-->
--> --On onsdag, oktober 05, 2005 16:18:29 +0100 Stewart Bryant
--> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-->
--> > It has been suggested that we should change this to:
--> >
--> > "PW Type values 1025 through 4096, and 32767 are allocated through
--> > the IETF Consensus Process"
-->
--> The most stringent 2434 term is "standards action", I
--> think... I would
--> encourage using 2434 language wherever possible...
-->
-->
--> _______________________________________________
--> Ietf mailing list
--> [email protected]
--> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
-->
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
