kent crispin writes: > Toleration of disagreement has almost nothing to do with it. Instead, it's > more a matter of signal to noise ratio on a limited bandwidth channel. If > you fill up a list with ignorant drivel, people who don't have time to deal > with drivel will go away, leaving the list to those who produce the drivel. > That's the problem. I've seen it happen many times.
Can you write a program that will scan a message and determine whether or not it is ignorant drivel? If not, then how can it be used as a criterion of equitable censorship? I never call anyone's messages ignorant drivel, and there's good reason for that. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
