Dave Crocker wrote: > This looks like quite a good list. The only thing I would add is an > interactive submission tool that validates the xml2rfc document being > submitted. > > Rather than explicitly penalize the text submitters with an earlier date, > I'd suggest providing a bonus extension deadline for those submitting via > this interactive path, since it would require NO human intervention on the > I-D publishing side... after the tool gets built. >
I don't want to end up in long discussions on IETF list. But one of the reasons for EARLY submission deadline is to ensure that the IETF participants actually get some time to READ/STUDY the documents that need f2f time in IETF WG meetings! Bert _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
