JFC (Jefsey) Morfin writes... > So , IMHO, the IETF urgency is today the other way around: > incorporating into RFC standards, practices or tables authoritatively > written or thought in another language than English, or in English > using normative non-ASCII art drafts or using term in a meaning > foreign to the IETF.
If all RFCs are written in English, basically so that there is at most one additional language in which one must be fluent to understand and implement the protocols described therein, wouldn't it defeat the purpose to have normative references written in other languages? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
