Ted Hardie wrote:
At 9:07 AM -0500 12/21/05, Tony Hansen wrote:I would be happy with the text that was used in the xmpp charter: Although not encouraged, non-backwards-compatible changes to the basis specifications will be acceptable if the working group determines that the changes are required to meet the group's technical objectives and the group clearly documents the reasons for making them. This text still keeps the bar high for unnecessary changes, was already vetted through an existing charter, and helped us through a similar impasse when xmpp was chartered. Tony Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]I agree with Tony on the benefits of re-using this language, and
> it certainly works for me. Me too FWIW. Stephen. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
