Michael, Nice note.
One point, however: Michael Thomas wrote:
We have already agreed to -- and incorporated -- a substantial backward incompatible change (the canonicalization) due to feedback (and threats) we got. What I'm hoping for
We have agreed to the addition of an enhancement that provides a good alternative to the existing set of two algorithms.
That is quite different from tossing out over-the-wire backward compatibility.
I have not seen the group agree that a sender of an (ESTG) DKIMv1 signature will fail with an (IETF) DKIMv2 validator.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
