> Ned Freed wrote:
> >> (Unicode lacks a no-op, a meaningless octet, one that could
> >> be added or removed without causing any change to the
> >> meaning of the text).
> > NBSP is used for this purpose.
> My proposal u+FFFE was nonsense, I wanted u+FEFF. The latter
> is "zero width nbsp" (aka BOM), did you also mean this beast ?
Yes.
> Not a no-op in some cases wrt hyphenation and composition, so
> it's probably not what Tom wants.
It's close enough.
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
