> Think of it as an explicit "interoperability considerations" section to > supplement the usual "security considerations" one.
That seems reasonable, so long as someone steps forward to write it. > I note that we have never standardized a magic bullet in the anti-spam > area. I believe that to have been a good trend. Perhaps this would be a good time to remind people that they can build a spam-proof walled garden today with S/MIME. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
