Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Speaking for myself, I agree. The whole point of rough consensus is to leave scope for some nay-sayers, but it's for the WG Chairs (if relevant) and the IESG to judge whether the number of objections is significant.
That is what were asking for in this case. Stewart _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
