on 2006-01-11 23:00 Ned Freed said the following:
>> *> From: "Brian Rosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> *> To: "'Paul Hoffman'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
>> *> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:13:35 -0500
>
>
>
>> *> The RFC editor has some problems which have not, to my
>> knowledge,
>> *> been enumerated.
>> *>
>
>> Your knowledge is apparently incomplete. The RFC Editor has been
>> actively experimenting with using xml2rfc for publication, and we have
>> been passing our problems along to the tools team. As we get more
>> experience, new ones show up. There is not currently a version of
>> xml2rfc that meets our needs. Some of our editors do the major
>> editing in XML, but they find it most efficient and effective to
>> switch to nroff for the final cleanup of the (ASCII) document format.
>
> Rather than sending such suggestions to the IETF tools team, why not bring
> them
> up on the xml2rfc list? Given that I don't see names like "Charles Levert" and
> "Julian Reschke" and "Marshall Rose" on the current tools team list, I'm a
> little concerned that certain things might be lost in process of getting them
> from the tools team to the actual xml2rfc tool maintainers.
I fully agree. Comments should go to the xml2rfc list. And as a matter of
fact, the tools team has not received any feedback or comments from the
RFC-Editor regarding the xml2rfc tool. If we had, we would have forwarded it
to the xml2rfc list.
Henrik
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
