In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeffrey Hutzelman
writes:
>
>
>It seems like the more efficient approach would be to essentially have two
>stages, where the authors first sign off on the result of copy-editing, and
>then on whatever cosmetic changes are needed after the final conversion.
>
That assumes that the xml->nroff conversion is always error-free. I
think that that's an overassumption.
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
