John Loughney writes: > Now we're close to side veering off into process issues, but > rather than going into that rat-hole, I'll just pose a question: do > you think p2p protocol authors would have any motiviation to create > a Security Considerations section that would pass IESG review?
Do you think that protocol authors would have any good reason to submit anything for anyone's review, when the same time could be spent writing software products? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
