Joel M. Halpern writes: > Assuming I have properly understood Mr. Morfin's email, the best argument I > have seen for permitting all IETF email list adminsitrators to ban him as > they deem necessary is his own description of his behavior. > > Mr. Morfin appears to have stated that if he feels an opinion is important > he will push for it (as he should.) He has also indicated that he will > keep pushing for it on any and all mailing lists even after the working > group chair has determined that a rough consensus exists. > > If I have understood his postings in this discussion correctly, Mr. Morfin > has specifically indicated that he intends to behave in ways that are not > in accord with the rules. It seems to me that the sensible response to a > notice of intended misbehavior is to be prepared to respond immediately and > directly to such behavior. > > The proposed action specifically gives the list managers / chairs that > necessary authority in the light of Mr. Morfin's exhibited and asserted > behavior.
Replace "Mr. Morfin" with "Dr. King" and see how it sounds. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
