Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> A practice I used when I was diffserv chair and we had quite a lot
> of off-topic postings was to create a second list, diffserv-interest
> (which still exists BTW). The rule for [EMAIL PROTECTED] was "must
> be relevant to a chartered work item" and the rule for diffserv-interest
> was "must be relevant to diffserv technology."
Though I never participated in diffserv WG activities, which was
chartered wrongly from the beginning, your chairing strategy
explains why the result of the WG is technically meaningless.
> People only interested
> in the standards work simply ignored the -interest list.
They ignored the -interest list and the technology.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
