JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote: > I hope this list will soon be a IANA managed mailing list, > or that the IESG requires the WG-ltru to gives it a more > precise status through RFC 3066 bis (a debate I proposed > and I was denied).
That's of course not the case, it was debated for quite some time in "the making of 30066bis": <http://mid.gmane.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://mid.gmane.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Just two examples grepping for "3934" in an LTRU archive. > I consider that Harald and I are both only trying to do our > best to clarify a complex issue to the benefit of the users > and of the IETF. I genuinely hope the IAB decision will help > us to openly discuss it, taking the necessary time. Whatever it takes. I like a new IAB draft published recently: <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-02> -- Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
