Sorry, managed to hit send button to early.

The IPR statement is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=688


Stefan Santesson
Program Manager, Standards Liaison
Windows Security


-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Santesson 
Sent: den 28 februari 2006 15:26
To: 'Bill Strahm'; Russ Housley
Cc: Bill Fenner; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Steven M.
Bellovin
Subject: RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed
Standard

This empty appendix was removed in draft 02.

As Russ stated before, an IPR disclosure has been posted to the IETF IPR
page which can be found at:


Stefan Santesson
Program Manager, Standards Liaison
Windows Security


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Strahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: den 20 februari 2006 02:21
To: Russ Housley
Cc: Bill Fenner; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Steven M.
Bellovin
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed
Standard

I saw all of the huff, and while I agree with it, I am more concerned
about

Appendix A. IPR Disclosure

    TBD

What does that mean, and more specifically is a document with a TBD 
section really ready for last call at all ?

Bill
Russ Housley wrote:
> I misunderstood the original question.  I'll get it fixed or withdraw 
> the Last Call.
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
> At 12:38 AM 2/19/2006, Bill Fenner wrote:
> 
>> >Can we have a Proposed Standard
>> >without the IETF having change control?
>>
>> No.  RFC3978 says, in section 5.2 where it describes the derivative
>> works limitation that's present in draft-santesson-tls-ume, "These
>> notices may not be used with any standards-track document".
>>
>>   Bill
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to