I agree here, Brian. Interoperabilty must be maintained. The issue is, will China agree?
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > ... > > Ignore China? > > No, that would be foolish. > > We automatically ignore any pseudo-TLD that only exists within > a walled garden, because it is simply invisible outside. > It isn't part of the global Internet. If it appears in any > way outside the walled garden, it is meaningless. > > I think there are a number of examples of this already. > > IMHO, what we *should* do is think about how the related > requirement can be properly defined and how it can be > satisfied in the global Internet. > > Brian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > sleekfreak pirate broadcast http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
