Hi.
Sam Hartman wrote:
I am happy to make a change similar to the one you propose in section
1.
I'm happy to split the parts of section 4 dealing with what the IESG
might do into their own section as an example.
That's fine by me.. it should make a self-consistent document.
I do not want to remove them completely.
Would that be OK
As regards gen-art I think it would be fine.
Ultimately I am only a small part of the consensus as regards the
experiment proposed.
Personally, I would prefer that we didn't have to waste inordinate
amounts of time on mailing list management. Unfortunately knocking
virtual heads together isn't very effective.
/Elwyn
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
