I'm not disagreeing with anything in this discussion.

However I don't think we need to address this in the discussed document.
The username in the defined domain hint is an account name and not
necessarily a host name. Name restrictions in this case are thus
governed by user name restrictions for the accessed system.


Stefan Santesson
Program Manager, Standards Liaison
Windows Security


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric A. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 7 mars 2006 21:06
> To: Mark Andrews
> Cc: Kurt D. Zeilenga; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment
> 
> 
> On 3/7/2006 8:16 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> 
> >     * Hostnames that are 254 and 255 characters long cannot be
> >     expressed in the DNS.
> 
> Actually hostnames are technically defined with a maximum of 63
characters
> in total [RFC1123], and there have been some implementations of
/etc/hosts
> that could not even do that (hence the rule).
> 
> But even ignoring that rule (which you shouldn't, if the idea is to
have a
> meaningful data-type), there is also a maximum length limit inherent
in
> SMTP's commands which make the maximum practical mail-domain somewhat
> smaller than the DNS limit. For example, SMTP only requires maximum
> mailbox of 254 octets, but that includes localpart and @ separator.
The
> relationship between these different limits is undefined within SMTP
> specs, but its there if you know about the inheritance.
> 
> When it is all said and done, max practical application of mailbox
address
> is 63 chars for localpart, "@" separator, 63 chars for domain-part.
> Anything beyond that runs afoul of one or more standards.
> 
> </pedantry>
> 
> --
> Eric A. Hall
http://www.ehsco.com/
> Internet Core Protocols
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to