That will be correct if they are really US sponsors, which don't seem to be
the case most of the time.

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Keith Moore <[email protected]>
> Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fecha: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:49:16 -0500
> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Asunto: Re: Making IETF happening in different regions
> 
>> So you mean you think is reasonable and fair going for the cheapest even if
>> every time more and more people can't attend because a government decides
>> not to grant visas ?
> 
> you're conflating two problems - cost and immigration laws.
> 
> having fewer meetings in the US is a reasonable response to US
> immigration law.  asking US sponsors to pay for the additional cost of
> holding those meetings outside of the US is not reasonable.
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Slides available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the 
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that 
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, including attached files, is prohibited.




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to