I remember that some time back there was the concept: "If there is something similar already out there try to reuse it (or at least you have to justify for a really long time why you need some a little bit different)."
Now, some folks seem to introduce a new concept: "Hey, I have just had this really, really simple idea why don't we just trash related existing work." Ciao Hannes > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Alper Yegin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Mai 2006 00:21 > An: 'Lakshminath Dondeti' > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is > PANA actuallyuseful?) > > > GEE is but a small optional enhancement to address the > > case of parallel EAP authentications. GEE is not an EAP lower layer > > and thus it is invalid to compare it to PANA. > > What is GEE than? Please explain it to us in terms of RFC 3748. > > > So far evaluations done by the broader > > community seem to be concluding that PANA is in fact complex and not > > easily deployable. > > Who would that community be? > > I have heard the complexity issue from you and few others > multiple times, > but there has never been a justification to this claim. > > We are not feeding on complexity, we are not married to it > either. If you > can tell us what parts we can simplify, the whole community would be > grateful to you. > > Please describe where you see unnecessary complexity, and > suggest remedies. > > Thanks. > > Alper > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
