> From: John L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 8:27 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: John C Klensin; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Image attachments to ASCII RFCs (was: Re: Last 
> Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to 
> ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats))
> 
> > You mean that we should update the current medieval print format to 
> > take advantage of the best technology available to the Victorians?
> 
> Yeah.  I realize that it's appealing to upgrade to the latest 
> half inch nine track tapes (a format that lasted 20 years, 
> after all), but I get the impression that I'm not the only 
> person who would prefer to move with greater caution.

Nine track was effectively obsolete a decade ago.

No problem getting support for it:

http://www.chicorporation.com/ninetrack/drives/9906.html

The key to making sure you have lasting support is to make sure you choose a 
standard that enough people depend on that you are not going to be the only 
person needing a compatible exit strategy.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to