Title: Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)

Very much agreed.

--
Sent from my Palm Treo - Sorry if Terse

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Keith Moore [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent:   Friday, June 23, 2006 05:25 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     Burger, Eric
Cc:     [email protected]
Subject:        Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:18:40 -0400
"Burger, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I would offer that in *some* groups the running code bar is reasonable.

I would have little objection to requiring running code as a test of feasibility of a new idea.  I would object strongly to an argument that just because someone has running code, means it's a good indication of adequacy of the protocol...DKIM is a great example of a poorly designed protocol that has been justified by running code.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to