Hi - > From: "Stewart Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... > Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 8:26 AM > Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Additionto > ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats) ... > What is unique about the work of the IETF that it does not need graphics > to produce precision specifications when the other SDOs do? ...
Though other organizations use fancy graphics to various degrees, in the cases where I have first-hand experience (ITU, ISO, DMTF) it's not clear to me that they actually *needed* to use them. I think the UML diagrams that pervade CIM are a good demonstration of how the "need" to use graphics indicates that something else isn't quite right. As for traditional mathematical notation, I think resorting to it for all but the simplest formulas, e.g. "y =(m * x) + b)", often does a grave disservice to all readers who are not mathematicians. Randy _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
