> > I'm much more interested in trying to figure out > > how to get WGs to stay on track in the first place and to accept useful > > clue from elsewhere. > > I maintain that no process will accomplish that. The only way to get a > WG to accept a clue is to demonstrate that their output is irrelevant > by concrete example.
no process can ensure that WGs stay on track, but we can certainly do better than what we have now. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
