Hi Bob,
> *> >
> *> >>And I'd be reasonably happy if we specified 'any version of rsync
> greater
> *> >>than X.Y.Z', or some such. The current debian stable version (2.6.4-6)
> *> >>would work for me.
> *> >
> *> > Saying "rsync version 2.6 or later" works for me, as long as we
> *> > understand the "can't eat our own dogfood" aspect of this requirement.
> *>
>
> A contractual requirement at this level of detail seems totally
> crazy.
So how would you specify the requirement to provide rsync
functionality in the SOW?
Henrik
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
