On Thursday, September 07, 2006 07:48:45 PM -0400 Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, he could ask that 2195 be advanced as-is, but I would expect such an effort to fail, as that version has turned out to be somewhat underspecified. Multiple interoperable implementations is not the _old_ criteria for advancement; it is necessary but not sufficient(*).
Ugh. s/_old_/_only_/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
