On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kolkman-appeal-support > > ...it's just wrong.
I think he's got a good idea. It maybe could use some tweaking. The IETF should stop doing things that are not relevant to its constituency and serve only to waste its (donated) time-dollars. This includes but is not limited to: appeals from total nuts. One perfectly acceptable tactic, which Olafur has codified in this draft, is to limit appeals to only those made by mixed nuts. I think it would be more productive to suggest alternative tactics than to ask Olafur to withdraw his draft. We would all like to know what other options there are. > I didn't try to find three "paying members" to > support that opinion, and nobody else is "qualified" to support it :-( ...nor would you have had to. -- ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area, covering topics from DNS to DDNS & DHCP. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time, Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again." Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
pgpgEUoU6KKuA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
