Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

> RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps)
> Referenced by: draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis-03,
> draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3731bis-04, draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3732bis-03,
> draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3733bis-04
> This reference is sited to capture a format that is also available in
> the W3C's XML Schema specifications.  It can be replaced with an
> existing normative reference to the W3C specification.

That's odd, why should you be forced to replace a normative reference to
the perfectly fine RFC 3339 by some spec. published elsewhere ?  AFAIK
nothing is wrong with RFC 3339, let's just promote it if that's what it
takes to reference it. 

Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to