On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:10:48AM +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
> >But this is enough about my opinions. Please
> >state your opinion -- in the interest of not
> >replicating this discussion on multiple lists,
> >send follow-ups to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 3 last call comments:
>
> Secondly, in Section 7 the IANA allocation is described as
> "temporary", yet there is no definition of what "temporary" means in
> this context. The authors should be consulted to define "temporary"
> in terms of clear instructions to IANA (e.g. unitil otherwise
> instructed by the IESG, or for 5 years from the data of the allocation,
> etc).
>
> regards,
>
> Geoff Huston
>
as i recall, there is already precident for the length of
"temporary" delegations. Back in the previous century, the IANA
tended to treat "temporary" delegations for experimental purposes
to a 12 month window.
Five years is effectively permanent.
that said, i'm happy w/ the rest of the document.
--bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
