> Mark, Sam,
>
> It seems to me that a reference from the draft to the code
> description or to Bind 9 more generally, with a note to the
> effect that Bind 9 is believed to contain an implementation of
> what is being described in the document, could head off a great
> deal of confusion... including all of the confusion we have seen
> in the last week or so.
>
> john
BIND 9 currently implements only a single DLV tree for ".".
The policy refects the intended state once lookups in
multiple DLV trees are supported.
> --On Tuesday, 31 October, 2006 08:42 +1100 Mark Andrews
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The documents are essentially the same. In particular the
> > policy to resolve the handling of multiple dlv namespaces
> > which overlap is the same. This was not so in earlier
> > versions.
> >
> > Mark
>
>
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
