> > there is also a > > tendency of people who have vague and/or poorly-thought-out > > proposals to demand that other people invest more work > > determining the nature of the problems with their proposals, > > than they have themselves invested in analyzing either the > > problem they purport to be trying to solve or the potential > > pitfalls of their proposed solution. > > I might be incompetent but I am pretty sure that my proposals are not vague.
I wasn't talking about you, or about any specific proposal that you've written. > I have made very detailed technical proposals. I have shown that it is > entirely possible to support wildcarded prefixed DNS records without changing > the legacy infrastructure and without changing the wildcard definition in > DNSSEC. okay, fine. while I'm sure they're useful, wildcard prefixed DNS records is not a problem that I've seen a pressing need to solve. > I have made exceptionally specific technical proposals yet you still don't > seem to feel that these rise to the level that warrants your technical > consideration (as opposed to the time taken to reply here). it's not as if I'm equally interested in all proposals. I, like you, have a limited amount of time and energy and choose to expend that time and energy on proposals that matter to me - either because I think they're trying to do something important and beneficial or because I think there's a significant chance that they'll do harm. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
