Martin,
yes, I agree. Janet "Dolly, Martin C, ALABS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/01/2006 02:05:54 PM: > Janet, See inline, Cheers, Martin > > Janet wrote: > The mis-perception that the WG is focused on "precedence and preemption" > is, unfortunately, reinforced by the list of milestones, which focus on > the > "military" environment. > > I would also, as an individual, favor modification to the list of > milestones to include milestones that are clearly not associated with > "precedence and preemption". > > >>MCD>> The main authors have a certain focus in their writing, but this > can be moderated with input from others (e.g., those representing the > ETS community, as an example). For this to occur though, the environment > for providing input needs to be a bit more "friendly" (for lack of a > better term). > In addition, as I stated earlier on this topic there is not one forum > that can address all of the industries needs. There is a place for the > IETF, ATIS and the ITU, and we should avoid "forum bashing", as it leads > us no where. > > Cheers, > > Martin _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
