On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:09:21 -0800
Michael Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The other thing that occurs to me -- and I know this has been brought
> up in many different forms -- is that if an AD _was_ following the
> working group to some degree, why is it legitimate for them to wait
> for IESG evaluation to voice comments that affect the protocol's
> operation?
Most ADs don't follow most WGs in any detail -- they can't possibly do
so. They should (and generally do) follow their own WGs, possibly the
others in their area, plus one or two elsewhere that they're personally
interested in.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
