Sam Hartman wrote:
However the IETF as a hole is an excellent resource for taking a look
in situations where more eyes are required.  An example of this is
when there is a minority who is unhappy with the consensus or when
there are specific issues we want greater review on.


1. There are important differences between "getting greater review" and "getting IETF-wide rough consensus". For example, one is an analysis process, while the other is a decision-process.

2. What are some examples of a demonstrated IETF-wide consensus against work submitted to the IESG? What improvements resulted?

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to