--On Monday, 26 February, 2007 13:45 -0500 Sam Hartman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be happy with this title change. Does anyone object?
No.
And, while I sympathize with the problem Tom discusses, the
solution lies, IMO, in at least a 2026 replacement and probably
some rethinking of the standards process, not in tuning this
document or its direct predecessor. I proposed just such a
rethinking with ISDs, which would have made this whole
conversation irrelevant, but have been convinced to go out of
that business.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
