>>>>> "pbaker" == Hallam-Baker, Phillip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pbaker> I agree that there were no technical comments but the summary pbaker> states 'no comments'. Arguments on complexity are too easy to pbaker> make. Every time a proposal is made I hear the complexity pbaker> argument used against it. Everything we do is pbaker> complex. Computers are complex. Committee process usually pbaker> increases complexity somewhat. pbaker> If an argument can always be used what is the discrimination power? I find that it's not useful to consider complexity as an abstract concept in this context. The world is complex. What is important is how we manage that complexity. I think that it is much more useful to evaluate complexity from a functional perspective. More later. ---Tom _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
